Privilegio fondiario nei confronti del terzo datore di ipoteca dichiarato fallito tra giurisprudenza e nuovo Codice della Crisi di Impresa e dell’Insolvenza
Abstract
The Court of Naples North defines with rejection the
application for suspension of the execution promoted by the bankruptcy of the
third mortgage company in relation to an executive procedure initiated by a
land creditor. The Bankruptcy claims the illegality of the prosecution pursuant
to art. 41 T.U.B. of the enforcement procedure against the third party who has
issued a mortgage to guarantee the debts of others, given the non-subjecting of
the right of the land creditor to the procedure for verifying the passive
status and, consequently, the inevitable lapse of the procedural privilege
provided for by the Text Unique.The Execution Judge, embracing the thesis according to
which admission to bankruptcy liabilities only conditions the provision of
provisional assignment of the proceeds from the sale in the executive seat and
not the admissibility of the execution and affirming that the only judge
competent to verify the existence of the landed nature of the enforceable title
is that invested with the expropriation procedure, rejects the application for
suspension.
References
- BUSANI A., Nulli i mutui fondiari oltre l’80%, in Norme e tributi – Il Sole 24 Ore, 7 settembre 2017, p. 25.
Close [X]
Buy the article
Cibo assum quidam at est, iusto tibique dissentiet eum ad. Te partem persius mentitum pri. Duo no commodo senserit. Ferri rebum debitis ea pri, timeam blandit rationibus te nam. Velit phaedrum interpretaris his id, mutat vidisse facilis eu pri.