LA VALUE RELEVANCE DELLE SPESE DI RICERCA E SVILUPPO NELLE SOCIETÀ QUOTATE ITALIANE

Abstract

This study aims at investigating the value relevance of research and development (R&D) expenses reported under International Accounting Standard (IAS) 38. Using a sample of Italian listed firms for the period 2006-2012, we divide firm-year observations into two groups: firms capitalising R&D and firms expensing these costs in the income statement. In addition, we isolate R&D expensed by capitalisers firms. Results show that R&D costs expensed by capitalisers firms are value relevant, while this relation does not hold for expensers firms. In addition, capitalised costs are not related to market value either. According to the literature, these results can be due to the discretion given to the management in a) assessing future economic benefits so as to capitalise R&D expenses b) defining the difference between "research” and "development”. Our results contribute to the extant literature in the following ways. First, our results are particularly interesting for preparers, since they are informed about the economic consequence of R&D accounting policy choices. Second, we report a lack of information in most of the annual reports we examined, which constitutes an input for Standard Setters and market authorities. In the end, we conclude that implementation and enforcement regarding the reporting of R&D expenses under IAS 38 in Italy is far from being complete.

References

  • ABOODY D., LEV B., The Value Relevance of Intangibles: The Case of Software Capitalization, Journal of Accounting Research 36/1998, pag. 161 e ss.
  • AHMED K., FALK H., The value relevance of management’s research and development reporting choice: Evidence from Australia, Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 25(1)/2006, pag. 231 e ss.
  • AMIR E., LEV B., Value-Relevance of Nonfinancial Information: The Wireless Communications Industry, Journal of Accounting and Economics 22/1996, pag. 3 e ss.
  • BARTH M.E., LANDSMAN W.R., LANG M., International accounting standards and accounting quality, Journal of Accounting Research 3/2008, pag. 467 e ss.
  • BARTH M.E., CLINCH G., Scale effects in capital markets-based accounting research, Journal of Business Finance and Accounting 36/2009, pag. 253 e ss.
  • BUBLITZ B., ETTREDGE M., The Information in Discretionary Outlays: Advertising, Research, and Development, The Accounting Review LXIV(1)/1989, pag. 108 e ss.
  • CALLIMACI A., LANDRY S., Market Valuation of Research and Development Spending under Canadian GAAP, Canadian Accounting Perspectives 3/2004, pag. 33 e ss.
  • CAZAVAN-JENY A., JEANJEAN T., The Negative Impact of R&D Capitalization: A Value Relevance Approach, European Accounting Review 15(1)/2006, pag. 37 e ss.
  • CAZAVAN-JENY A., JEANJEAN T., JOOS P., Accounting choice and future performance: The case of R&D accounting in France, Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 30/2011, pag. 145 e ss.
  • CHAN L.K.C., LAKONISHOK J., SOUGIANNIS T., The Stock Market Valuation of Research and Development Expenditures, The Journal of Finance 56/2001, pag. 2431 e ss.
  • DREFAHL C., ENGELEN C., HUNG TRAN D., The Value Relevance of R&D Expenditures in Germany – Does Corporate Governance Matter?, Working Paper 2013.
  • ECCHER E.A., Discussion of the Value Relevance of Intangibles: the Case of Software Capitalization, Journal of Accounting Research 36/1998, pag. 193 e ss.
  • ELWIN P., Discussion of ‘Accounting for intangibles – a critical review of policy recommendations, Accounting and Business Research 38(3)/2008, pag. 205 e ss.
  • GINER B., INIGUEZ R., An empirical assessment of the Feltham-Ohlson models considering the sign of abnormal earnings, Accounting and Business Research 3/2006, pag. 169 e ss.
  • GOODWIN J., AHMED K., Longitudinal value relevance of earnings and intangible assets: Evidence from Australian firms, Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation 15/2006, pag. 72 e ss.
  • HALL B.H., ORIANI R., Does the market value R&D investment by European firms? Evidence from a panel of manufacturing firms in France, Germany, and Italy, International Journal of Industrial Organisation 25/2006, pag. 971-993.
  • HAN B.H., MANRY D., The value-relevance of R&D and advertising expenditures: Evidence from Korea, The International Journal of Accounting 39/2004, pag. 155 e ss.
  • HAND J.R.M., The Role of Book Income, Web Traffic, and Supply and Demand in the Pricing of U.S. Internet Stocks, European Finance Review 5/2001, pag. 295 e ss.
  • HEALY P.M.,MYERS S.C., HOWE C.D., R&D Accounting and the Tradeoff Between Relevance and Objectivity, Journal of Accounting Research 40(3)/2002, pag. 677 e ss.
  • International Accounting Standards (IAS). Principio Contabile Internazionale n. 38, Attività Immateriali.
  • LA PORTA R., LOPEZ-DE-SILANES F., SHLEIFER A., What Works in Securities Laws?, Journal of Finance 61/2006, pag. 1 e ss.
  • LEV B., SOUGIANNIS T., The Capitalization, Amortization, and Value-Relevance of R&D, Journal of Accounting and Economics 21/1996, pag. 107 e ss.
  • LEV B., ZAROWIN P., The Boundaries of Financial Reporting and How to Extend Them, Journal of Accounting Research 37(2)/1999, pag. 353 e ss.
  • LUCIANETTI L., COCCO A., MINUNNO G., La rilevazione degli investimenti in R&S e la significatività dell’utile e del capitale netto, Financial Reporting 3/2011, pag. 45 e ss.
  • MARKARIAN G., POZZA L., PRENCIPE A., Capitalization of R&D costs and earnings management: Evidence from Italian listed companies, The International Journal of Accounting 43/2008, pag. 246 e ss.
  • MAZZI F., LIBERATORE G., TSALAVOUTAS I., Insight on CFOs perception of IAS 36 reporting, Working paper 2014.
  • OHLSON J.A., Earning, book value, and dividends in equity valuation, Contemporary Accounting Research 11/1995, pag. 661 e ss.
  • OLIVEIRA L., RODRIGUES L.L., CRAIG R., Intangible assets and value relevance: Evidence from the Portuguese stock exchange, The British Accounting Review 42/2010, pag. 241 e ss.
  • ORGANISMO ITALIANO DI CONTABILITÀ (OIC), 2005. Principio Contabile n. 24, Immobilizzazioni Immateriali.
  • OSWALD D.R., ZAROWIN P., Capitalization of R&D and the Informativeness of Stock Prices, European Accounting Review 16(4)/2007, pag. 703 e ss.
  • PAVAN A., PAGLIETTI P., La value relevance dell’informativa di bilancio: dai principi contabili italiani agli standard contabili internazionali, Rivista Italiana di Ragioneria e di Economia Aziendale 1/2011, pag. 19 e ss.
  • PETERSEN M.A., Estimating standard errors in finance panel data sets: Comparing approaches, Review of Financial Studies 22/2009, pag. 435 e ss.
  • SHEVLIN T., The Valuation of R&D Firms with R&D Limited Partnerships, The Accounting Review 66/1991, pag. 1 e ss.
  • SKINNER D.J., Accounting for intangibles – a critical review of policy recommendations, Accounting and Business Research 38(3)/2008, pag. 191 e ss.
  • SOUGIANNIS T., The Accounting Based Valuation of Corporate R&D, The Accounting Review 69(1)/1994, pag. 44 e ss.
  • TSOLIGKAS F., TSALAVOUTAS I., Value relevance of R&D in the UK after IFRS mandatory implementation, Applied Financial Economics 21/2011, pag. 957 e ss.
  • VELTRI S., SILVESTRI A., La value relevance dei valori contabili dopo la crisi finanziaria: un’applicazione al mercato italiano, Rivista Italiana di Ragioneria e di Economia Aziendale 3/2011, pag. 562 e ss.
  • ZHAO R., Relative Value Relevance of R&D Reporting: An International Comparison, Journal of International Financial Management and Accounting 13/2002, pag. 151 e ss.
Close [X]

Buy the article

Cibo assum quidam at est, iusto tibique dissentiet eum ad. Te partem persius mentitum pri. Duo no commodo senserit. Ferri rebum debitis ea pri, timeam blandit rationibus te nam. Velit phaedrum interpretaris his id, mutat vidisse facilis eu pri.

Required fields are marked *

Authors

👤  Roberto Biagioni
👤  Giovanni Liberatore
👤  Francesco Mazzi