La coesistenza della procedura esecutiva individuale proseguita dal creditore fondiario e di fallimento del debitore esecutato. Breve panoramica sulle scelte del curatore e sulle sorti dei costi di procedura e dei professionisti che gravitano intorno a tale fattispecie (nota all’ordinanza del Tribunale di Aosta, Sezione Esecuzioni Immobiliari, del 25 ottobre 2017)

Court of Aosta, called upon art. 512 of the Italian Civil Procedure Code.The dispute arised upon the distribution project of an individual enforcement procedure started by the "fondiario”creditor, raised by the insolvency administrator of the executed debtor intervened in the process.The Court after the analytical analysis of the applicable discipline, has perfomed an overview of costs and expenses of the various professionals involved in the individual enforcement and bankruptcy proceedings. In particular, the Court excluded the liquidation of legal expenses in favor of the bankruptcy procedeeings in the hypothesis in which it intervened in the enforcement procedure for the  only purpose of obtaining the allocation the residual of the proceeds of the sale, after the full payment of the "fondiario”creditor. The Court had, also, confirmed that the enforcement procedure has the power to liquidate the remuneration of the professional delegate for the sale and of the custodian.